Talk:Breeniverse

Delete?

can there be a discussion first it's not nonsense--Baitt (talk) 06:20, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I declined the speedy delete this because I agree with you that it is not nonsense. When I redirect it to lonelygirl15 my hope was that it would be integrated into that article. I have several reasons for wanting this to be done

This article lacks context for a reader not already familiar with the work of fiction to understand. Giving it context would create a substantial overlap with the "main" article (lonelygirl15).
Articles for whole universe perspectives of works of fiction are generally only warranted in substantially larger works (star wars, star trek, doctor who, etc) that have so many of books, movies, tv episodes and other cannon work in the fiction that multiple nontrival works were written about the universe itself and not just the fiction. For smaller works, such as this one, a short plot summary is warranted in the main article. While there are no "concrete" rules some guidelines are at Wikipedia:Notability (fiction).
"lonelygirl15" is the title of the work of this fiction, a plot summary and relevant information about the fiction as a whole belongs there. Breeniverse is a neologism created by fans, and is therefore the wrong name for the article. Wikipedia naming conventions are here: Wikipedia:Naming conventions.
lonelygirl15 is a well established article with many talented editors. By integrating the material there the material is more likely to increase in quality.

I have redirect the article again and encourage you to go into the history and ingrate any relevant material with lonelygirl15. If you disagree with me, you are free to undo my changes. If we cannot agree I will start a larger community discussion about how this information should be organized. Jon513 (talk) 13:01, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]