Talk:Breast anatomy

Merger proposal

I propose this article be merged with Breast — Preceding unsigned comment added by JakobSteenberg (talk • contribs) 18:56, 16 January 2013 UTC

If we start merging all the sub-articles, then the main article will be too large and difficult to navigate. Dreadstar ☥ 19:17, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the subs:

Since breast is allready quite long would it not be smart to move some of the information regarding anatomy to breast anatomy and insterting a {{Further|Breast anatomy}} at the reduced anatomy section in breast? Eventhough the anatomy section in breast is very well written it might be to long/complex for non-health professionals or readers who just want a quick overview? --JakobSteenberg (talk) 19:54, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I like that idea. Maybe re-word the suggestion on the Talk:Breast page, modify the merge using Template:merge to in the appropriate sections in the Breast article and see what everyone thinks! Dreadstar ☥ 20:04, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay and done. Discussion have been moved to talk:breast#Merge discussion. Thank you for our input.

Needs expansion/revision

The majority of this article is currently an overly-detailed summary of a single paper, lacking context and key concepts, and provides less information than the superior, more comprehensive coverage at Breast#Anatomy. Key features and organs should be defined first and foremost, and relatively minor details such as new findings on the relative location of glands discussed afterwards, if at all. The merge tag is still active, and I think it would be a good idea to use the information from Breast#Anatomy as the bare minimum for what this article should be, otherwise it hardly warrants its own article.--Animalparty-- (talk) 21:04, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]