Talk:Brazoria, Texas

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Houston (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Houston, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.HoustonWikipedia:WikiProject HoustonTemplate:WikiProject HoustonHouston

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

It is requested that an image or photograph of Brazoria, Texas be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Nigger/'N' Word Controversy

Is it Wikipedia policy to censor words? It is a pedestal of facts, not political correctness, last I checked. I'm replacing "'N' Word" with "nigger" and linking to the "nigger" article, considering they are considering banning the word "nigger." That needs to be mentioned, and it is being used in a non-racial way, so I see no problem with it. --Captain Cornflake 02:38, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was removed the first time because no source was provided that would allow anyone to verify the claim. The next question is, does what you put in the article match what the source says? It really does not. The article gives examples of similar efforts in other locations. The third question is whether it is notable enough for this article. I doubt that it is. 100's of news items happen every day, and Wikipedia is not a news service. Johntex\^talk 02:57, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I didn't add the news bit in the first place. I was just cleaning what somebody else added. --Captain Cornflake 01:47, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was just explaining the removal of this trivia from the article. If we do ultimately decide to include this tidbit, it actually should say "the N word" because that is what the source said. The source never says "nigger". So, the anon that added the info was right to use the phrase as used by the article. I maintain that it is a trivial item that is not on a par for inclusion into this article, as I explain above. Johntex\^talk 16:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brazoria, Texas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:33, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Brazoria, Texas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://factfinder2.census.gov/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100725200949/http://www.tdcj.state.tx.us/stat/unitdirectory/cn.htm to http://www.tdcj.state.tx.us/stat/unitdirectory/cn.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:21, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]