Talk:Brazilian monitor Ceará/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:56, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
[edit]- Per WP:CITESHORT the notes need the year of publication added.
- That's a guideline, not a requirement.
- Donato, Hernâni (1996) (in Portuguese) needs an ISBN added
- OCLC # added instead
- The external link Brief history of Ceará (Portuguese) is dead
- Deleted.
- There is a difference between the draught imperial measurements between the text 4 ft 11 in–5 ft 0.6 in and the inf box 5.0–5.1 ft
- Fixed
- The text also has two tubular boilers while the inf box claims 4 boilers
- Fixed
- The lede is a bit small at one paragraph but I can see little to use to expand it
- Agreed, not a whole lot to work with. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:47, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
--Jim Sweeney (talk) 12:16, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Passed GA Jim Sweeney (talk) 06:29, 17 October 2010 (UTC)