Jump to content

Talk:Brazilian monitor Ceará/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:56, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments

[edit]
  1. Per WP:CITESHORT the notes need the year of publication added.
  1. That's a guideline, not a requirement.
  1. Donato, Hernâni (1996) (in Portuguese) needs an ISBN added
  1. OCLC # added instead
  1. The external link Brief history of Ceará (Portuguese) is dead
  1. Deleted.
  1. There is a difference between the draught imperial measurements between the text 4 ft 11 in–5 ft 0.6 in and the inf box 5.0–5.1 ft
  1. Fixed
  1. The text also has two tubular boilers while the inf box claims 4 boilers
  1. Fixed
  1. The lede is a bit small at one paragraph but I can see little to use to expand it
  1. Agreed, not a whole lot to work with. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:47, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--Jim Sweeney (talk) 12:16, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]