Jump to content

Talk:Braver Angels

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Changed from what?[edit]

Why not say "Better Angels"? An article should anticipate questions, not raise them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.103.143.236 (talk) 13:24, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. The original name seems to have gotten lost from the renaming paragraph when this article was split off from Institute for American Values. — M.boli (talk) 15:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion underway[edit]

I'm working on expanding this article through a course in WikiEdu for scholars. I've gathered about a dozen academic articles and book chapters. Let me know if you are also interested in working on this article. ProfGray (talk) 09:33, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

  • Source: Doherty, William J., and Tai J. Mendenhall. "Braver Angels: Counteracting political polarization." In W. J. Doherty & T. J. Mendenhall, Becoming a citizen therapist: Integrating community problem-solving into your work as a healer (pp. 93–111). American Psychological Association. https://doi-org.proxy.lib.miamioh.edu/10.1037/0000378-008
  • ALT1: ... that conservative and liberal participants in Braver Angels Red/Blue depolarization workshops understand each other better if they share political views with their own group first? Source: Oliver-Blackburn, Bailey M., and April Chatham-Carpenter. "‘But I don’t know if I want to talk to you’: strategies to foster conversational receptiveness across the United States’ political divide." Journal of Applied Communication Research 51, no. 1 (2023): 55-71.
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: June 27-29 is their national convention, so that'd be great timing for a DYK. I'm part of a WikiEdu course on 2024 US elections and I will continue improving this article over the coming week(s). I'd especially welcome advice on the ordering and naming of sections. I'm in touch with the organization and hope to get some images for Wiki Commons and the article.
5x expanded by ProfGray (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

ProfGray (talk) 00:35, 15 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • @ProfGray: QPQ not needed. Article is long enough and recently expanded. Article is copyvio-free. ALT0 is interesting and well-sourced; I fell that ALT1 is too general. The article has one issue: there is a paragraph that lacks citations, which I tagged. Once that is fixed, the hook can be approved. Kimikel (talk) 01:55, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]