Talk:Brandon Scoop B Robinson

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

African diaspora

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Agree with Ronz

This appears to be a lot of marketing/self promotion by the individual themselves. And as Ronz says, the editing patterns are fishy. Not to mention, it's questionable whether the person passes the tests for being on wikipedia. normally this is reserved for more established members of the media and authors. -- Sept 18, 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.250.2.100 (talk)

Made Some Edits

Made some edits a while back on Robinson. On the indie scene he seemed well respected. He's grown since making headlines with his reporting over the last year. He is surely, notable. Advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jean luc harrington (talk • contribs) 00:42, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Too much like a resume

If there's anything written about him with depth and context, the article should be rewritten from them. Right now the article looks like an extension of various public relations campaigns for him, which is no surprise given the extensive amount of WP:SPA editing. --Ronz (talk) 03:36, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So, is there anything written about him with depth and context, other than clearly promotional material? --Hipal (talk) 01:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks everyone for the cleanup over the past year.

I'm still concerned that this is a resume rather than an encyclopedia article. Glancing at the first 10 refs, overall they appear poor and promotional. --Hipal (talk) 20:08, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I remove the tag

I purposely remove the tag, because I removed deadlinks & possible pro Shawoniakr (talk) 11:06, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored it for the reasons given directly above. --Hipal (talk) 16:27, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]