Jump to content

Talk:Boys' Ranch/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Well written, I made one minor copy-edit, follows the MoS adequately
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    All online references check out. I asume good faith for off line sourcing. Sources appear to be reliable.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    The article is broad enough and focussed. I can't think of much more that could be said.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    the licensing tag on File:Simonkirbyphoto.jpg is incorrect. It is not a "non-free comic" it is a photo of the authors, although it appeared in a comic book reprint. I have changed it to {{Non-free historic image}}, which I think is more accurate and hopefully correct
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

OK, good to go. I am happy to awrad this article GA status. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 23:07, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanky kindly fer some mighty fine evaluatin' pawd'nuh - me and the the boys' is much oblidged! --Scott Free (talk) 16:33, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing the assessment and well done everyone who worked on the article!! (Emperor (talk) 03:16, 7 April 2010 (UTC))[reply]