Talk:Bowden, Ashprington

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Too many problems to count

I don't really know where to start with a clean-up. It's not clear to me whether the building is intended to be notable in and of itself (meaning, presumably, its architecture), or on account of the putative notability of the folks who've inhabited it.

Further discussion here.

The first half appears to be a copyright violation, copied-and-pasted from, perhaps, an unpublished monograph. I've done what I can to clean that up, trim and summarize. But then I got to the second half, which is basically just a big-ass list of people, also presumably copied-and-pasted from other sources.

Does anyone care enough about this article to make an argument in favor of the notability of its subject?
Bill Woodcock (talk) 00:25, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, substantial clean-up done, probably good enough for now. Bill Woodcock (talk) 08:30, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to top bit done. Added infobox. Genealogy not really my area of expertise so left that. Hope I've helped. EPEAviator (talk) 21:54, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]