This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dorset, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics connected with Dorset. If you would like to participate, you can visit the WikiProject Dorset project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.DorsetWikipedia:WikiProject DorsetTemplate:WikiProject DorsetDorset
Do other editors think its a good/bad idea to include the amount of councillors that currently make up the old councils before dissolution? I was thinking including the pictures of the councils' numbers such as Bournemouth's and Poole's, and creating one for Christchurch. Jonjonjohny (talk) 13:56, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that despite the new leadership and administration, the Unity Alliance still exists as a somewhat formal grouping, according to this article from the Bournemouth Echo today. Notably it states that five formal groupings which made it up during administration are still members, and it has a chair. It might be an idea to add a section underneath the political groupings section, but I'm not entirely sure how to format that.
--BryceIII (talk) 13:21, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]