Talk:Bounded Choice/Archive 1

comment

Why is Ricky Ross included in this article Mark1800 03:45, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the table of contents is fair use and very informative. I think it should be restored. Andries 09:28, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

it is not a psychology book. Lalich is a sociology professor or lecturer. Andries 09:30, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have gotten some other editors pretty upset, for utilizing table of contents on other book articles. See articles: Crazy Therapies (book), and Combatting Cult Mind Control. I am of the same mindset and agree with you that this is fair use, I just wish other editors would either be of the same opinion, or just not voice their opinions so harshly all the time. Thanks for the support. Yours, Smeelgova 09:33, 21 October 2006 (UTC).[reply]

If someone could find a more critical review from a reputable source and add a quote from it to this article, that would be appreciated. Yours, Smeelgova 08:23, 23 October 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Please state your reasoning here. I feel that 2 succinct quotes/reviews from opposing viewpoints on the book will do quite nicely. Yours, Smeelgova 19:43, 23 October 2006 (UTC).[reply]
We don't need quotes about the book - they overshadow what little content there is. In any case, the table of contents does not even remotely belong. --Improv 01:19, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Compromise: Restored quote, which is factual and NPOV, and leave out Table of Contents. Smeelgova 02:21, 24 October 2006 (UTC).[reply]