Talk:Boundary-Similkameen

Canada: British Columbia / Electoral districts Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Electoral districts in Canada.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Notable MLAs

The two that have articles are Richter and Barlee; Jim Hewitt is highly notable and deserves a bio, not my forte though....Skookum1 (talk) 00:18, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Old riding/new riding

I'm I'm not mistaken the boundaries of this riding very closely resemble the original, although the old, old Similkameen riding included Princeton and environs. This is one of those articles where old/new maps are rather de rigeur so I'll add reqmap; but by a map it's not a location map that's needed but a map or two maps showing the boundariies of the riding. Placing the centrepoint of this riding on an electoral districts map would be putting hte cart before the horse etc....Skookum1 (talk) 00:18, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is Penticton in this riding now? If memory serves, it wasn't in this riding before, which indeed makes it a very different riding than the previous incarnation; it was in Okanagan South no?. i.e. when the old Boundary-Simlikameen existed....Skookum1 (talk) 00:25, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Other uses

Also to note that the term Boundary-Similkameen is used in non-electoral-district ways; partly because of the continuity of community along the Crowsnest Highway and the frontier-era economic/social ties within the region. I think it was in fact a term already in use before the parent ridings were merged....Skookum1 (talk) 00:20, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boundary-Similkameen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081004023944/http://www.elections.bc.ca/index.php/resource-centre/electoral-history-of-bc/ to http://www.elections.bc.ca/index.php/resource-centre/electoral-history-of-bc/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:51, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]