Jump to content

Talk:Bouldering

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBouldering has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 20, 2013Good article nomineeListed
January 10, 2025Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

Citation cleanup

[edit]

Someone did not read Template:Rp/doc before using {{Rp}} all over the place. That template is for when the same source is cited numerous times at different pages, and most uses of it in this article need to be replaced by moving the page numbers into the citations. Only a few sources are cited multiple times at non-contiguous pages.

Also, all the cases of {{rp|ch. 1}}, etc., need to be replaced with specific page numbers.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  11:33, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Stonkaments (talk) 16:05, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bouldering. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:24, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bouldering. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:13, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Main Photo

[edit]

Hello,

Can we take a vote on which image is more relevant to keep for the main photo of this article?

1: Bouldering in Idyllwild, California

2: Bouldering in Coopers Rock

Let me propose other options:

I do not like the photo #1 as the main image as I find the too confusing. I was looking for an image where you do not have to zoom in to figure out of what is happening in the image. --Jarekt (talk) 05:48, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Of the additional options proposed, I still am in favor of the original #1 since the proposed options are uninteresting and quite generic. Looking for other peoples opinions or proposals. Rsriprac (talk) 14:55, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  1. 3 is better, less confusing perspective and sums up what bouldering is like. Is there a copyright reason we can't use some good pictures of professional boulderers? How were these pictures chosen? Aa24577 (talk) 03:50, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re-ordering Topics

[edit]

I have placed Grading before High-balling since the V-scale is used there.Oldtimermath (talk) 04:08, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Damage

[edit]

"Using chalk can cause damage to the stone....removing chalk can erode the surface of the stone"

Seriously? I am actually almost convinced this is supposed to be a joke. Is someone posting satire on here, trolling us all? Or are the just not familiar with how reality works?

Now, if they are your rocks and you don't like the visual defacement of your rocks, fine. But that doesn't belong under the heading of "environmental concerns". Rocks erode, a few millimeters isn't going to change the world for the worse. Idumea47b (talk) 18:01, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

[edit]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria due to uncited statements in the article, some of which have been tagged with "citation needed" since April 2021. Is anyone interested in addressing this concern, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 18:51, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

Bouldering

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review
Result: Kept. Hog Farm Talk 02:05, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article has uncited statements, including some tagged with "citation needed" since April 2021. Z1720 (talk) 22:07, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As difficult as this will be, for all kinds of reasons, I think that I'm uniquely suited to rescue this article's GA status. So I will. I will also depend upon the abundance of good will, grace, and understanding of the editing community. Thanks in advance. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 17:11, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Update: I've gone through this article, updating and improving its references and sources, doing some copyediting, and removing all unsupported claims. Many of the issues were added after the original GA review way back in 2013. The original review was certainly old enough for an assessment, anyway. It now fulfills the GA criteria. It could use more work to make it more extensive and more comprehensive, but it's adequate for GA at this time. Thanks, Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 23:42, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thoughts Z1720? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:16, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think this is OK now. Z1720 (talk) 23:38, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Reference

[edit]

The National Geographic article referenced in the history section is full of errors. Bouldering at Fontainebleau began in the mid to late 1800s and also in England during the late 1800s. Possibly in other places in Europe (ref. johngill.net for example). Gill was not an eccentric USAF officer from Colorado Springs (see his wiki page). Oldtimermath (talk) 22:21, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bouldering&oldid=1269887481"