Talk:Bosnia and Herzegovina in the Eurovision Song Contest 2010

Bosnia and Herzegovina in the Eurovision Song Contest 2010 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 29, 2022. (Reviewed version).

Bosnia and Herzegovina Low‑importance

	Bosnia and Herzegovina portal Bosnia and Herzegovina in the Eurovision Song Contest 2010 is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Eurovision Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eurovision, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Eurovision-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EurovisionWikipedia:WikiProject EurovisionTemplate:WikiProject EurovisionEurovision
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Passed — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 14:15, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bosnia and Herzegovina in the Eurovision Song Contest 2010/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Golden (talk · contribs) 13:32, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this article. — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 13:32, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Apologies for the late review! A nice article overall with some issues that can be easily addressed:

Lead & Infobox

Add a comma after "with the song "Thunder and Lightning""

Everything else is good with the lead and infobox.

Background

Refs #1 and #2 checked – both are reliable and have appropriate information about the sentences they're cited for. No MOS issues in this section either.

Before Eurovision

Link Oslo
Ref #6 doesn't support the sentence it's cited for
Neither Ref #8 nor #9 mention "BHRT Studio A" or it being held in Sarajevo.
Ref #12' URL opens the main page of the website
Ref #11 only supports Rybak's appearance in the show, the rest are unsourced (I imagine they were cited in Ref #12, which doesn't work).

Refs #3, #4, #5, #7, #10, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19 all checked and fine.

At Eurovision

Unlink Oslo as it should be linked in Before Eurovision section
1-8 -> 1–8 (en dash instead of a hyphen)

Refs #20–#37 checked – all are reliable and have appropriate information about the sentences they're cited for.

Conclusion

No issues with plagiarism (9.1% per Earwig's copyvio detector). All three used images in the article are free. No major issues with MOS and sourcing. @Grk1011: Ready to pass once you've addressed the above issues. — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 08:11, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Golden: I believe I addressed your concerns. I also added a small bit more that I discovered while trying to track down some supplemental refs. Thanks for the review! Grk1011 (talk) 14:03, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Grk1011: Excellent, all points adequately addressed. Happy to pass. Congratulations! — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 14:14, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.