Talk:Boscobel House

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shropshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shropshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Shropshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShropshireWikipedia:WikiProject ShropshireTemplate:WikiProject ShropshireShropshire
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Shropshire

I'm sorry but it's in Shropshire. It has a Staffordshire postal address - that's all. It is listed as a Shropshire site by English Heritage. It's also clearly shown as being on the Shropshire side of the boundary by OS maps. Check on any site that uses them. It never was in Staffordshire. It was an anomaly for many centuries, excluded from the parish and county system altogether. But it is now definitely in Shropshire. I'll give it a few days for anyone to find any serious argument to the contrary, then it's being changed back.Sjwells53 (talk) 21:09, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology

Original text: "The name is also clearly reminiscent of the Norman ancestor of the Giffard family, Osborn or Osbern de Bolebec, count of Longueville, and may be a deliberate verbal play^{[citation needed]}."

There's been a demand for a reference on the Bolebec connection for some time. Blount et al were hardly likely to explain the jest, as it was a bit precious and not greatly improved by a laboured explanation, especially as most 17th century gentry hearers would simply get it straight away. If I told you my dog had no nose, your enjoyment of what followed would not be greatly enhanced by pointing out that it hinges on an ambiguity introduced by a verb that has transitive and intransitive uses. Jokes are generally a bit fragile when examined closely.

I've sought a rewording that evades the need for a citation of the joke. You're free to reverse it if you think I'm cheating.Sjwells53 (talk) 12:17, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Boscobel House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:51, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]