Talk:Boronic acid

Petasis Reaction

Does anyone want to write a section on this? I wont have a chance to until June — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eggilicious (talk • contribs) 13:23, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Petasis reaction exists V8rik (talk) 15:51, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So do pages on many of the other reactions utilising boronic acid in the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eggilicious (talk • contribs) 17:35, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Boronic acid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:24, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Major-ish edit proposal

The boronate/boronic ester section is seriously lacking, and to be honest I'm surprised it doesn't have its own page, considering its popularity in synthesis and sensing. I intend to either build it up over the coming few weeks or possible even revive the the boronate ester article and remove the redirect. Contributions welcome, of course. RRBinwood (talk) 08:48, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Great idea. Try to emphasize reviews and books, otherwise these articles often end up focused on specialty results. Another thing: graphics. It is possible that some graphics should be replaced. Some older editors tended to highlight exotica vs mainstream content. We recommend --Smokefoot (talk) 11:01, 20 January 2020 (UTC)wordless graphics, just chemistry then put the words in the caption.--Smokefoot (talk) 10:46, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Totally in agreement. A lot of the transformations and uses of boronate/boronic esters are covered in fair depth in their own articles, so an overview of general content, with links to the specialised pages, would be more appropriate here I feel. Have noticed a lot of outdated ChemDraws throughout Organic Chemistry wiki articles, may well go through and fix as many as I can one day when I'm bored. RRBinwood (talk) 12:06, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]