Talk:Borland Turbo Debugger

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

About Turbo Debugger and emulation section: It's probably should be tested in Microsoft Virtual PC and VMware also. --Yonkie (talk) 18:27, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done this with VPC; TD almost works (it loads a source program; the program appears to be all there as you can view the variables but the source screen is blank). TD386 and TD386 were never going to work in virtual 8086 mode. But TD.EXE seems to work fine in an XP 32 command prompt, and TDH386.SYS can be loaded to give 386+ hardware breakpoints. I don't think this is really "original research" as anybody with access can check it. I haven't used this setup extensively, but it did load a program, stop at breakpoints, display a couple of watches, and run the program exactly as expected. Pol098 (talk) 23:17, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dosbox 0.72 and td.exe ver 3.1

I can run Turbo debugger version 3.2 under dosbox. The article claims otherwise. What's the deal? Powerslide (talk) 00:10, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dosbox 0.74 and td.exe ver 5.0

Agreed; I can (and do) use TD 5.0 (the latest). Furthermore though, the article should explain what these magical control mechanisms are which fault due to a VM/emulator. I see Powerslide questioned this a full five years ago; it's high time for this to be corrected! Gamkiller (talk) 19:02, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turbodebugger10.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Turbodebugger10.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 20 June 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Turbodebugger10.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:44, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Borland Turbo Debugger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://bdn.borland.com/article/images/20841/tc20ad.jpg
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070405233209/http://www.codegear.com:80/Products/CBuilder/tabid/123/Default.aspx to http://www.codegear.com/Products/CBuilder/tabid/123/Default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:08, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]