Talk:Borderline (magazine)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Magazines Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Comics: British Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by British comics work group.

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Link?

there is no link for the magazine is it downloadable magazine ? i think the site was http://www.borderlinemagazine.co.uk/ but doesn't work right now

This magazine was a downloadable magazine which no longer exists and the website from which you could download issues also no longer exists. Some issues can be downloaded from a blog set up by former contributors, the address is in the body of the main article.

Copy violation?

I flagged the page as having Marketspeak but checking the link I see a lot of this is because the key sections (like the opening and closing sections) are lifted verbatim from here. Given the obvious copy violation and the tone of the content I think this needs a radical rewrite. (Emperor 11:38, 18 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Both version were written by the same person, so there is no copy violation. If the previous editor - Emperor - believes this needs a radical rewrite he should be aware of just about every other entry for comics magazine on the wikipedia site. Also, it is possible that 'Emperor' has a vested interest in debunking this entry. (User:Allerton

I am intrigued by that claim as I have no vested interest (I'd not heard about it before stumbling across it on a general tidy-up) and if you, or any other user, has concerns I did then they are free to ask for a second opinion on the Comics Project talk page but I can assure you my only interest is making all the entries as high quality as possible. Reading the comment below and double checking edit history you are right that the blog post is actually taken from here which is fine (I missed it as the text was tiny) and you'll notice I didn't actually flag this up as actual copyright violation - I was expressing a concern. That said the entry is still written like an advert and needs to be re-written to fit with the standards expected of an encyclopedia. Again if you think I have some kind of agenda then you are welcome to request further opions on the Comics Project talk page and I'd be more than happy to go with the consensus opinion from there. (Emperor 21:46, 23 May 2007 (UTC))[reply]

The outside link gives a link to Wikipedia as the source "Source : Wikipedia/Borderline"

The outside link is the only live page to download some of the Borderline issues. All issues are free and it is not a commercial venture.(User:Krimsun10:38, 23 May 2007 (GMT))

"Reading the comment below and double checking edit history you are right that the blog post is actually taken from here which is fine (I missed it as the text was tiny) and you'll notice I didn't actually flag this up as actual copyright violation - I was expressing a concern." You're welcome to flag this Emperor but as one of the writers and project members of Borderline I have no objection to the material being used on the blog. It also links to Wikipedia and is covered under the GFDL agreement - even so - if Wikipedia have a problem with the use of the text on the blog they only have to say and it will be altered. In the greater scheme of things it's not actually worth mentioning. Your concerns are noted and appreciated.(User:Krimsun20:55, 24 May 2007 (GMT))

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Borderline (magazine)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I can't understand how the guy who flagged this can call it an advert. How can it be an advert when it no longer exists. How can he also suggest that it's written without verification when a google search will verifiy its existence and the praise it received. Methinks, Emperor has a vested interest in debunking one of the seminal moments in comics magazine publishing. To quote Jose Arragantio - he is a tit.

Substituted at 21:36, 26 June 2016 (UTC)