Talk:Border pipes

Scotland Mid‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Musical Instruments Mid‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that one or more audio files of a musical instrument or component be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and included in this article to improve its quality by demonstrating the way it sounds or alters sound. Please see Wikipedia:Requested recordings for more on this request.

Border

There is a comment, shortly to be deleted, on the bagpipes page that border pipe refers to any kind of pipe played on the Scottish-English border. Semantically true, but for most people 'border pipe' means what is described in the article, not a pipe that fell out of use two hundred years ago. Calum 11:46, 27 February 2006 (UKC)

The other kinds of pipe played on the Scottish border have more precise names of their own. Scottish smallpipes, keyless Northumbrian smallpipes, pastoral pipes, and perhaps Highland pipes for example. The modern usage 'Border pipes' usually refers to the revival of the commonest type of outdoor bagpipes then found in northern England and the Scottish lowlands, characterised by a conical bore and 3 drones in a common stock. Deleting what could be a misleadingly broad definition would be helpful.John Gibbons2 12:19, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

this article appears to be copied directly from http://www.bagpiper.com/info/n-62/border-pipes.html Maelbrigda 16:44, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Check the page history - most of the work on this article was done by John Gibbons, and a fine effort it is too. bagpiper.com (ugh, what a name) has just lifted the text straight off the article without attribution, something that happens regularly to bagpipe articles (my article on Gordon Duncan, for example, can also be found inhabiting the blogosphere). Calum 15:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A section on 'Notable players' has just been added, containing a single name, of Paul Dunmall, whose Wikipedia page describes him primarily as a saxophonist, who also plays Northumbrian smallpipes. Undue emphasis maybe? John Gibbons 3 (talk) 23:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The criterion for including someone in 'Notable Players' para should not be 'Does he have a WP page?' but 'Is he a notable player?'. Hamish Moore and Matt Seattle are referred to in the text and are authors of links from it.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Border pipes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:22, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Border pipes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161012140855/http://www.experiencewoodhorn.com/archive.MOR~MU~215~134 to http://www.experiencewoodhorn.com/archive.MOR~MU~215~134

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:39, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Missing link to photo

The section on description refers to a photo, but the links for it point to an Indonesian gambling site. I deleted them as there is no point maintaining deliberate link rot, but perhaps someone else knows what photo this refers to and has a good link. The problem appears to hav even there for a while. 22:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Now resolved. Mutt Lunker (talk) 00:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finding that. Fenevad (talk) 13:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]