Talk:Booze Cruise (The Office)

Booze Cruise (The Office) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Booze Cruise (The Office) is part of the The Office (American season 2) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 16, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
January 11, 2013	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

California: Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage / The Office Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by The Office task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force.

Name problem

Typically US-centric: Booze Cruise has been used for donkey's years in the UK for a ferry trip to buy booze and cigarettes in France, then the whole category gets hijacked by just one episode of a second-rate US TV 'canned-laughter comedy'. Can someone create a disimbiguation page linking to 'booze cruise' (the original source of the phrase) because I don't know how to do this (yet).

It needs to list:

Booze cruise (UK Colloquialism for ferry trip to buy alcohol, tobacco etc)

The Booze Cruise (UK television comedy drama)

Booze Cruise (an episode of the US version of "The Office" sitcom)

ChrisRed 09:42, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll create one, because I didn't realize Booze cruise (with the lower case c) was already listed. But "Canned laughter comedy"? There's no canned laughter at all in this comedy! Williamnilly 15:43, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have you even watched the show, because if you did then you would know it doesn’t feature a laugh track and if you haven’t then you have know right to call it “a second rate comedy”.--72.146.210.253 15:48, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I watched half of one episode, which was enough. It was abysmal compared to the original Ricky Gervais version, and not even funny by American standards. I can't remember whether it had canned laughter or not, but on balance I think that it must not have, because canned laughter becomes very obtrusive when there is nothing funny happening on the screen. ChrisRed 09:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dunder Mifflin

I am going through several articles and changing instances of "Dunder-Mifflin" to "Dunder Mifflin" (no hyphen) as it is the proper "spelling" of the company name (see Talk page at Dunder Mifflin). Just leaving a note to say that I've gone through this page. :) Fieryrogue 16:05, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is that Ed Helms?

At approximately 12m15s in this episode, which I downloaded from iTunes, a character with a straw hat and a white collared shirt is looking at Darryl. Is it Ed Helms? This episode is in season 2, before Ed Helms joined the show as Andy Bernard. 70.36.139.66 (talk) 02:39, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB lists a different actor as "tequila man." So, no. 70.36.139.66 (talk) 05:24, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Booze Cruise (The Office episode)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
These sentences, in the Plot section, ---> "The Dunder Mifflin crew goes on a "motivational" cruise on a Lake Wallenpaupack ship Princess, captained by "Captain Jack" (Rob Riggle)" and "The boat's captain puts Dwight Shrute (Rainn Wilson) in charge of a fake wheel, which Dwight thinks is real", are a little hard to understand, it would be best for them to be re-written. Same section, I know who Katy is, but how 'bout the person that reads this article.

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
In the lead, it would be best to add (NBC) after "National Broadcasting Company". It would be best to link "Dunder Mifflin" in the Plot and it wouldn't hurt to link "Greg Daniels" in the Production section.
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article! Also, contact me if the above statements are answered.

-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:43, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your time, I made changes off your suggestions, tell me what you think! --Mr.crabby (Talk) 01:59, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its my pleasure, since this is one of my favorite tv shows. Thank you to Mr.crabby for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:53, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again, this is the quickest GA review I've ever had --Mr.crabby (Talk) 21:56, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Booze Cruise (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:06, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Booze Cruise (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]