Talk:Bootleg Fire
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bootleg Fire article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on December 11, 2022. The result of the discussion was WP:SNOW keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A source to consider for notable wildfires: Wildfire Today
[edit]I'm not editing this article now, but for detailed coverage which strikes me as highly reliable for facts, I suggest: Wildfire Today, for which Bill Gabbert is usually the author. Gabbert has been cited by other Wikipedians in the article on Vapour-pressure deficit, on specific wildfires, etc. Some of the coverage is opinion, but this should be easy for a Wikipedian to spot. (In my own opinion, Wildfire Today's opinions are highest quality I've seen on the topic, but those are opinions.) For the Bootleg Fire, Wildfire Today already has a tag to find articles here. Oaklandguy (talk) Oaklandguy (talk) 15:54, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Disaster management articles
- Low-importance Disaster management articles
- Start-Class Oregon articles
- Low-importance Oregon articles
- WikiProject Oregon pages
- Start-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- Articles created or improved during WikiProject United States' 50,000 Challenge
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class Wildfire articles
- Low-importance Wildfire articles
- WikiProject Wildfire articles