This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Zoroastrianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Zoroastrianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ZoroastrianismWikipedia:WikiProject ZoroastrianismTemplate:WikiProject ZoroastrianismZoroastrianism articles
A statement intended to discuss the period in which the book was most likely written was removed with the following edit summary "Alexander's depiction as a "Roman" is due to naming of an empire after the dominant people. Sound familiar?" I fail to see the relevence of this remark, or the point of the rhetorical question. Could Fullstop explain? The purpose of the sentence is to locate the book at the time of Roman/Parthian rivalry. The "naming of an empire after the dominant people" is precisely the point. Paul B (talk) 21:27, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
