	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Hymenoptera task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Fall 2015. Further details are available on the course page.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): PhonoxClassic. Peer reviewers: Callisons, Mohp7, Roohi.byakod.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

Hello!

I have reviewed your article for grammatical errors and have found that barely any changes were necessary. Besides a couple cases of italicization of bee species' names, there were no other mistakes I could find. I did, however, abbreviate "Bombus" in most cases where the genus was already mentioned in the paragraph (i.e. I shortened "Bombus muscorum" to just "B. muscorum") to prevent crowding and make it easier for the reader. I also added a handful of hyperlinks that I thought might be important. Overall, the article was very well written, and there were a sufficient number of headings that were allocated appropriately to the information you presented.

Roohi.byakod (talk) 21:36, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review

I thought your paper was very well written and provided sufficient information on multiple categories. I corrected some grammar mistakes, added some hyperlinks, and defined what "polylectic" meant to help those that don't understand the terminology as well. Not that many changes were needed. If I would suggest anything I would recommend adding more sections on behavior; for example, do they have territorial behaviors or mating behaviors.
Mohp7 (talk) 20:23, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Nice article- it is well written and a contains lots of information!

One thing I would have liked to know is the natural predators of this species. Besides that I made minor changes. Under "parasitism" I noticed that the subheading itself ("Crithidia bombi") was hyperlinked. I removed this and added a hyperlink in the body itself.

I also moved the the "status" section -which was previously a main heading - to be a subheading under human impact and created a new subheading called "habitat destruction"

Great Job!

RNwumeh (talk) 02:31, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]