Talk:Bombing of Wieluń/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 15:14, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
- Good article. I tightened up the lead a bit to clarify. Do you have a picture of the town before bombing? auntieruth (talk) 15:14, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Auntieruth55: Not aerial, I am afraid. Take a look at commons:Category:History of Wieluń, in particular commons:Category:Old Wieluń - do you think anything is relevant? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:33, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Piotrus: I see the problem. Nothing really good. I'd add a "battle" info box to it, and use the first image you have as the box image. It's not really a battle, but it would suffice to add some salient details about time, coordinates, first attack of WWII, etc. Will you do that? Cheers, auntieruth (talk) 14:48, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Use: Infobox military conflict
- @Auntieruth55: Good idea. Infobox added. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:08, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- nice job.
- Pass/Fail: