Talk:Bomb suit

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bomb suit article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Technology Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Occupational Safety and Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bullet Point Bugs

Some browsers render the bullet point list in the history section strangely at certain zoom levels. Seems to be related to how they are next to an image on the left side of the screen, which seems to mess up the indentation. I've noticed these problems in both Oprah and Firefox browsers. Perhaps this is a general Wikimedia bug that should be addressed in the proper channels. However, I think this article should be adjusted in the meantime, but I don't want to remove any of the images because they fit the article very well despite the bugs. Perhaps the left image in the history section can be moved to the right? I don't see enough room so I'm unsure of how to act. Lockethot (talk) 14:51, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have created a bug report for this issue on Phabricator: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T201847 Lockethot (talk) 15:10, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bomb suit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:40, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gloves

Howcome all of the pictured bomb technicians have bare hands? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.186.125 (talk) 00:17, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it has to do with manual dexterity. On a related note, why does the article mention interchangeable glove attachments which also prevent cross contamination from fingerprints, when every photo example of a modern bomb suit shows the wearer with bare hands? Radioactivated (talk) 04:31, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]