Jump to content

Talk:Boland Amendment

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Added

[edit]

rjensen 6/29 major new material added — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjensen (talk • contribs) 16:46, 29 June 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Patrick Boland

[edit]

Who is this guy named Boland?Lan Di 20:23, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, his name is Edward Patrick Boland. Lan Di 20:27, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Intro

[edit]

In the first line, we need a concise summary of what the amendment actually said/did. Ojcit 05:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Background

[edit]

When referencing the notion that the CIA's acts of sabotage upset the Republican-controlled Senate, I see a fallacy. The Democrats swept the Congressional elections in 1982, and I would find it hard to believe that a Republican Congress would be outraged with a Republican President. Emir Faisal 07:48, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Background Item

[edit]

Last paragraph unequivocally states that the secret diversion fo funds by Col. North received "explicit presidential approval". If that were a non-debatable fact, we would have been talking about the '86 Democratic Congress attempting to impeach Reagan. Hence, I insert the qualifier "some allege". 65.115.32.162 00:28, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Characterization of Civil War

[edit]

I edited the first sentence to make it nPOV. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.235.102.193 (talk) 03:28, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Impounding

[edit]

An editor made an edit which was reverted, concerning "impoundment." Editors should be aware that impoundment has been around since Jefferson, though not used much until Franklin Roosevelt. Used a lot afterwards to derail projects the President disapproved of. In the continuing war between the two branches, this came to a head during the Nixon administration and the President lost this option for all time for all future presidents. But Nixon didn't make this up! Student7 (talk) 00:43, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Boland Amendment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:14, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boland Amendment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:23, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boland Amendment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:13, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: United States and Latin America

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2024 and 12 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sdr1453 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Ablack csustan (talk) 20:50, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Legislative Chronology Section

[edit]

The legislative chronology section seems a little out of place and clunky. Is it a common part of entries concerning legislation? If not should it be removed and the information added in a more readable way?Sdr1453 (talk) 20:02, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen them be like that before (sometimes, just bullet points)....but if there is a way to make it more readible, please do so by all means.Rja13ww33 (talk) 14:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Boland_Amendment&oldid=1254401864"