Jump to content

Talk:Boeing P-29

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NACA vs Townend cowl

[edit]

That MIGHT be an (early) NACA cowl in the second picture, but the first picture definitely appears to be a Townend ring, so the text shouldn't say that ALL P-29' used NACA cowls instead of Townend rings, because obviously some didn't..45Colt 20:09, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, not only that, but it makes frequent reference throughout the article to "drag rings" (actually, "anti-drag rings" as well, which I don't think is a proper term). First, that's an obscure term that most people probably won't recognize. Second, "drag ring" refers to a Townend ring in American usage. It suggests at the top of the article that "the Wasp engine was fitted with a NACA cowl instead of a Townend ring...", but then goes on to say several times how the P-29 "used a drag ring", which IS a Townend ring. So which is it? Anyway, whichever one it is, it should say "Townend ring" or "NACA cowl", because most people have no idea what a "drag ring" refers to..45Colt 20:42, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boeing P-29. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:43, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]