Talk:Bobby (software)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Accessibility

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Accessibility, a group of editors promoting better access for disabled or otherwise disadvantaged users. For more information, such as what you can do to help, see the main project page.AccessibilityWikipedia:WikiProject AccessibilityTemplate:WikiProject AccessibilityAccessibility articles

Does the Bobby name live on?

I question whether there is any remaining truth in the following sentence:

"However, the Bobby name lives on in Watchfire Corporation's Watchfire Bobby program"

I'm somewhat certain that Watchfire kept the Bobby name only briefly, then ultimately abandoned the name after integrating its functionality into WebXAct. I'm also somewhat certain that this technology as it now exists within the IBM product no longer uses the name Bobby.

Can anyone confirm these facts?

Tfthompso (talk) 17:26, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The name Bobby definitely does not live on, nor do any of the subsequent products that integrated Bobby's functionality. Neither Watchfire (the company), WebXAct (the product/service), or IBM Rational Policy Tester (product/service) are now in existence. I'm considering rewriting the paragraph that uses this language, but I'm unclear about the details of how Bobby changed hands. Did Watchfire simply acquire the rights to use the Bobby name and logo, or did they acquire the technology itself? If the latter, I propose a revision like the following:

Bobby was acquired from CAST by Watchfire Corporation in 2005. Watchfire initially continued to provide Bobby as a free standalone service, but later incorporated its functionality into WebXACT, a tool that already tested web pages for quality, security, and privacy issues. Watchfire was acquired by IBM on July 20, 2007, and its accessibility testing functionality was incorporated into IBM's Rational Policy Tester Accessibility Edition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tfthompso (talk • contribs) 15:28, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I worked at Watchfire until 2007. There was a bobby.watchfire.com site as long as I was there, in fact I was one of the maintainers. Watchfire acquired technology, IP, and one person from CAST: Michael Cooper. No Bobby site is available today, of course.

W3C has a page on Michael Cooper [1]

However, the watchfire.com website today is a different Watchfire, a sign manufacturer. Linlithgow (talk) 18:57, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bobby (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:40, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]