Jump to content

Talk:Bob McCallister

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bob McCallister. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:26, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk19:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Bloom6132 (talk). Self-nominated at 20:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is long enough and newly expanded. It is eligible for DYK as it was only posted to ITN as a RD, not a bolded article. Article is well sourced with citations throughout. Hook facts are interesting enough. My one gripe is with the use of whatever tense it is that leads us to say "would stand", when we can simply say "stood". So that's my Alt1A above. No apparent close paraphrasing or POV. QPQ done. Good to go. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Bob McCallister/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 09:57, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Comments

  • "head pro" is that "professional"?
  • "him to have a go at the" to try the
  • "member of the golf team" don't link golf at this point.
  • "several PGA Tour events" link PGA Tour here.
  • "on the Tour one" no need to capitalise, this isn't the full formal name.
  • "record of shooting a 62 " this means nothing to non-golf experts.
  • "on the Tour" see above.
  • "and pocketed" won.
  • "by five strokes" what is that?
  • Same meaning as "X# of shots" (e.g. "ahead by two shots" and "coming two shots short" later in the article). —Bloom6132 (talk) 02:19, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "35-foot" convert.
  • "21-foot" same.
  • What's a "sectional event"?
  • Why not use full dates in the results table?
  • Not essential but would be good to have row and col scopes per MOS:DTT in that results table.
  • Refs 3, 9, 12 are lacking publisher info.

That's all I have on a first pass. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 10:23, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: thanks very much for the review! I hope I've addressed your comments satisfactorily. —Bloom6132 (talk) 02:19, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Could I also trouble you to hold off promotion for a few days? An editor from WP:GOLF reverted my edits adding full dates and scope rows per your comments above. I've since reverted him explaining that this was in response to GAN feedback and hope this doesn't descend into an edit war. —Bloom6132 (talk) 02:19, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, well Jimmymci234 should know that if the Golf project is against using row scopes and proper dates, then they are in the wrong. The project-wide guidelines supersede these parochial project "rules". The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 07:16, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've reverted that using the rationale you gave (thanks for that). The editor I referring to above was actually Tewapack, who made the initial revert. —Bloom6132 (talk) 08:40, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]