Talk:Bob Martin Petcare

This article was nominated for deletion on 5 January 2009. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Bob Martin Petcare is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Point taken but any potential copyright infringment fixed. This is a famous Britsh brand, with a long history. It should have a Wikipedia page.

Format now tidied up and lots more information.

The Business Wire article meets the notability criteria for a company —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.7.93.194 (talk) 22:55, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Business Wire item is not an article, it's a press release, and therefore says nothing at all about notability. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 10:27, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's a press release for a Datamoniter article about pet healthcare in South Africa. If it were a Bob martin press release (or had anything to do with Bob Martin), I would see your point. As things stand, I don't get where you're coming from at all. The press release states that the subject of the article is the market leader in South Africa, thus establishing notability. Case closed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Restraining (talk • contribs) 12:20, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's a press release, full-stop. A press release is not a reliable source, especially regarding notability. Case actually closed. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 13:29, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is surely semantics. It is no more a press release than it is an extract of a reliable, third-party, published source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Restraining (talk • contribs) 15:45, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

advertisement tag

I would like to remove the advertisement tag. My reading of the article is not spammy and just lists the products served. I will leave this up to consensus though. Thanks. ShoesssS ^Talk 16:10, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]