Talk:Board of supervisors
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Rename?
[edit]Hmmm, maybe this should be moved/retitled to "county board of supervisors"? Kestenbaum 02:14, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Ehh? {shrugs} --evrik 13:55, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
I don't care one way or another. However, there are "board(s) of supervisors" for non-county agencies, i.e., the governing bodies of the Louisiana state universities. Calwatch 02:53, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- Sure, but are those really within the scope of this article?
- Here in Michigan, the governing boards of the three major state universities, all elected statewide, have three different names (board of regents, board of trustees, board of governors). A lot of private colleges have a "board of visitors". Doesn't Harvard have a "board of overseers"? College/university governance is a whole other world. I presume this article is about local government. Kestenbaum 09:07, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Okay, retitling done. Kestenbaum 18:47, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Worldview tag
[edit]As far as I'm aware, only the U.S. has bodies called "county Boards of Supervisors". The situation is different to, say, county councils, which exist in a number of countries. I've therefore removed the {{worldview}} tag. — Lincolnite (talk) 22:15, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- The original tag, which was later redirected (inappropriately, imho), was for generic limited geographic scope, not worldview. I will add a currently existing tag that expresses this. Doctor Whom (talk) 18:38, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- Huh? The article adequately describes boards of supervisors as they exist in the states that actually have them. The "balanced geographical coverage" tag makes no sense.--Coolcaesar (talk) 07:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, no one has answered my question. I'm killing that tag. --Coolcaesar (talk) 08:05, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- Huh? The article adequately describes boards of supervisors as they exist in the states that actually have them. The "balanced geographical coverage" tag makes no sense.--Coolcaesar (talk) 07:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC)