Talk:Blurb, Inc.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Sorry for the confusion. Im going to do this first by removing the advertising that doesn't belong anywhere, and then by proposing a merge of the software article in to this one. Since it is the sole product, you cant reasonably have two articles on it. DGG 03:40, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicting stats in the History section?

The first paragraph reports that Blurb has delivered more than 14 million books published by "over half a million" customers, but then the third paragraph states Blurb's "two million" customers have published "8 million" books. I guess these are probably both accurate and taken from different points in time, but it reads pretty confusingly here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.194.39.67 (talk) 20:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blurb a publisher?

Blurb is a printing service for self-published works - Publishing is the process of production **and dissemination*** of literature or information. Blurb does not disseminate the works. The customers of the printer and layout-service publish themselves.(E-Kartoffel (talk) 07:27, 13 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]

They do, at the very least, appear to sell their authors' books through their website. That would count as dissemination wouldn't it? --Irrevenant [ talk ] 01:24, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blurb, Inc.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110429074337/http://www.webbyawards.com/webbys/current.php?season=12 to http://www.webbyawards.com/webbys/current.php?season=12

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This whole article reads like an ad

Hello, random Internet schmuck here. This entire article (not the talk page, dummy!) reads like corporate ad copy. Ugh. Maybe someone around here could at least flag it as such, if not clean it up? If need be, this particular random Internet schmuck may be contacted at laserhawk64@gmail.com. TIA. 174.193.132.152 (talk) 19:59, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Booksmart (film) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:18, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]