Talk:Blue dot
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Blue dot page. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled
[edit]Hi, I created this article. I didnt mean for the article to be 'blatant advertising'. What changes should be done to make this article valid? -furankupan
- Demonstrate notability as defined by WP:WEB. -- Ben (talk) 20:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- Even if it didn't look like an ad. The subject doesn't look like a notable website. See Wikipedia:Notability (web). There are tons of national and worldwide social networking sites. A strictly local one doesn't make the grade. Wikipedia is not a web directory and tries to limit articles to the most notable and significant sites. Fan-1967 20:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Well, Im off to lunch. I do believe the site is notable, and i will make by case as soon as i get out of my lunch meeting-furankupan 12:30 PST