Talk:Blue (2009 film)

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

Chiggy Wiggy was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 30 September 2015 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Blue (2009 film). The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Vandalism

Wow..what is to this movie that attracts such persistent vandalism? requested for page protection

Also some one had removed the review links using the wp:not indiscriminate collection of links

the policy says Wikipedia is neither a mirror nor a repository of links, images, or media files.[2] Wikipedia articles are not: Mere collections of external links or Internet directories. There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate. See Wikipedia:External links for some guidelines.

the review links are definitely content-relevant and thus wp:not is applicable here the star format for reviews are used in music albums also as far as i know and there is nothing written against such a format in WP:MOS for films trakesht (talk) 12:26, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

checkwiki 059

{{editprotected}} Per WP:CHECKWIKI #059, please replace this line:

| starring       = [[Sanjay Dutt]]<br />[[Akshay Kumar]]<br />[[Lara Dutta]]<br />[[Zayed Khan]]<br />

with this line:

| starring       = [[Sanjay Dutt]]<br />[[Akshay Kumar]]<br />[[Lara Dutta]]<br />[[Zayed Khan]]

--Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 11:27, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks for the clear and complete request. Skomorokh, barbarian 11:43, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

can some one please add the references...it was removed in some edit and was not reverted before protection trakesht (talk) 12:55, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Star ratings

I did a search on wp:vp and wp:film- regarding the usage of star rating in film- I could not find anything which says they should not be used- it does look like a good way to concisely present the opinion of critics and it is indeed used in audio albums. Please discuss and if you feel these are not required, please remove them. trakesht (talk) 23:18, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sentence needs improving

In the introduction, there's this sentence that looks somewhat strange: "The film is the most expensive Bollywood film." Should perhaps be something like, "The film is the most expensive Bollywood film to date." Something like that? --95.34.1.249 (talk) 19:36, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was merge. Secret of success (talk) 14:04, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to merge the article Blue (soundtrack) into this article Blue (2009 film). The content together is better for reading. Also the destination page size can accommodate merger. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 09:15, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: The soundtrack article size is long enough compared to the sound article. Hence, a separate soundtrack article looks better. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 10:28, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
comment the soundtrack article looks "long enough" - but the actual sourced and relevant content is actually minimal- a couple of paragraphs. Is there any chart/sales information that would indicate that this particular soundtrack was significantly important in the music world, moreso than the typical soundtrack? -- The Red Pen of Doom 14:28, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly speaking we could infact merge the film's article into the soundtrack's article. The film did nothing on it's own. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:38, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support for lacking notability, and as trpod says, it "looks long" but in reality, it isn't. Secret of success 14:34, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Should be merged with the main film article. Overview does not seem to required. Thanks. - Vivvt^Talk 03:05, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Blue (2009 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:57, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]