Talk:Bloody Fun Day/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Initial Comment

I'm going to be looking at the article, feel free to message me with any concerns. :) CanadianNine 00:36, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Checklist

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

Well-written, hard to decide on verifiable sources because it is a flash game, but I decided they were acceptable.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Again, non-blog sources are difficult, but I'll pass it because it's a flash game.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I'd just like to remind you that blogs are not normally acceptable as sources, but because it's Flash, I'll accept them. Congratulations!