Talk:Blood on the Dance Floor: HIStory in the Mix/GA2
GA Reassessment
[edit][[{{subst:Blood on the Dance Floor: History in the Mix}}|Article]] ([[Special:Edit/{{subst:Blood on the Dance Floor: History in the Mix}}|edit]] | [{{fullurl:{{subst:Blood on the Dance Floor: History in the Mix}}|veaction=edit}} visual edit] | [[Special:PageHistory/{{subst:Blood on the Dance Floor: History in the Mix}}|history]]) · [[Talk:{{subst:Blood on the Dance Floor: History in the Mix}}|Article talk]] ([[Special:Edit/Talk:{{subst:Blood on the Dance Floor: History in the Mix}}|edit]] | [[Special:PageHistory/Talk:{{subst:Blood on the Dance Floor: History in the Mix}}|history]]) · [{{fullurl:{{subst:Blood on the Dance Floor: History in the Mix}}|action=watch}} Watch]
The article contains bare links and ref errors. It contains several fact banners and unsupported content. The prose of the article remains unclear, it also contains grammatical errors. The article contains several dead links. The sample being used in the article heavily fails NFCC. The first paragraph of the Production and Music section is made almost entirely out of song titles. The article uses many "—" in its writing. It also uses reviews such as "negative" in the review box. Is that a POV assessment from a particular editor?The article contains many such faults and from a long time. It is also at 40,325 bytes, rather short for a GA, at that status from a long time. I don't think that the current revision meets the GA criteria. If work is done to address the concerns above (and more, if mentioned), the article can stay as a GA. MaRAno FAN 13:37, 3 February 2015 (UTC)