Talk:Bloeme Evers-Emden/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 03:37, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I intend to complete this review over the weekend. Most things look to be in order; however, Checklinks found a few dead links in the article, so I would appreciate if those could be cleaned up before I get started. Thanks, I look forward to this review. --Tea with toast (話) 03:37, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I updated all the URLs. I'm going to be out of town from Sunday through Tuesday this week, so I'll answer any more questions when I get back. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 20:17, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking care of the refs, Yoninah. The two remaining dead links in the article are both of the External links. Personally, I'd just remove them since they are not necessary to the article, but if you are welcome to keep them if you can find the correct urls. I'll come back once those have been taken care to pass my final review. I'll put the article on hold until then. Thanks. --Tea with toast (話) 01:26, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I updated the URL with her photo and deleted the second URL, since it's cited in the article. Yoninah (talk) 10:10, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Great job.! --Tea with toast (話) 02:59, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you are planning on moving forward with this article, perhaps one area that could be expanded is the reception of her work in the field of research. Perhaps you might dig up book reviews or scholarly reviews of her books. Just a suggestion. Happy editing! --Tea with toast (話) 02:59, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review and the suggestions! Yoninah (talk) 13:50, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]