Talk:Blasius theorem

Redundance

Premeditated Chaos added the section Blasius–Chaplygin formula because there was an article with that name, and in a discussion Wikipedians agreed upon a merger. But Blasius' theorem and the Blasius–Chaplygin formula are identical. In the former the velocity is $dw/dz$ and the contour is $C$ , in the latter it's $f$ and $γ$ . I suggest we delete the section Blasius–Chaplygin formula. The section's only reference is an informal pdf by Eremenko: this was not published in a journal, so we better leave Chaplygin out altogether. Herbmuell (talk) 09:03, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Dolphin (t) 22:08, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Dolphin, I did it and also overhauled what remains in the article. Feel free to improve on me. Herbmuell (talk) 09:03, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]