Talk:Blasius boundary layer
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
‹See TfM›
|
Text and/or other creative content from Blasius function was copied or moved into Blasius boundary layer with this edit on December 17 2015. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Sloppy and incomplete
[edit]Apart from the lack of citations I find this article lacking in other ways:
- The title covers only the first half of the article.
- I find the introduction to Prandtl's boundary layer equations inadequate and superfluous - there already exists a much better description on the Boundary layer page.
- Mention the application of Falkner-Skan to wedge flows.
- The boundary layer equations omit the pressure gradient which is essential for Falkner-Skan. I also think that it would be helpful to mention how Bernouilli's equation is used to express the pressure gradient in terms of velocity.
- It is remarked that the Falkner-Skan equation reduces to the Blasius equation for m=0. However, it does not in the form the presented here. One way to fix this is to add a trivial factor two to the similary parameter (in which case Blasius can be written as: ).
- The formulas are inconsitent using in the first half and in the second and it uses partial differentials where is should use ordinary differentials.
- A figure showing the effect of the pressure gradient (m) on the velocity profile would be useful.
Jprins66 (talk) 22:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Prandtl y-momentum equation
[edit]-Someone changed the Prandtl y-momnentum equation to "0 = dP/dy" from the original true Prandtl momentum expression. This is obviously not the correct Prandtl expression. It is not even a correct momentum balance equation. Setting dP/dy to zero was never invoked by Blasius. It is not a condition that is required to obtain the Blasius solution. I am therefore changing it back to the correct expression. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Weyburne (talk • contribs) 17:53, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
The link to the translation of the Blasius article is incorrect.
[edit]The linked paper is about cylinders, not walls. Aubrey Jaffer (talk) 17:31, 1 February 2024 (UTC)