This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Blackstone Inc. was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Private Equity, a collaborative effort to improve the depth of quality and coverage of the private equity and venture capital industry and related topics in Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
This project seeks to collaborate with the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.
Hi, I'd like to suggest a few factual updates to this article, all of which are supported by either Blackstone's 2020 annual report or by the Blackstone website (per WP:ABOUTSELF). Pinging Sdrqaz and Fences and windows who were recently active here, in case either of you has a few minutes to spare to implement this.
Lead section: In the second sentence of the second paragaph, update to: As of 2020[update], the company's total assets under management were approximately US$619 billion.[1]
Infobox:
Key people: Remove Byron Wien, as he is the vice chairman of a specific division at Blackstone (Private Wealth Solutions), not of the company as a whole. (Source)
Operating income: Remove this parameter, it is not a metric we use/report. (And it doesn't make much sense to continue displaying the number from the old 2017 annual report.)
AUM: Update to: US$619 billion (2020)[1]. Also, remove the number for "real estate AUM" as this is just one component of the total AUM - reflecting just one of Blackstone's multiple business segments.
Total assets: Update to: US$26,269 billion (Q4 2020)[1]
Subsidiaries: The companies listed here are not subsidiaries - they are a small selection of the many hundreds of companies in which Blackstone has invested over the years. In light of this, please remove the entire Subsidiaries parameter.
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 September 2022 and 8 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kaisery (article contribs).
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article suffers from quite a few things: there are buzzwords in the lead(4), the investments are an extremely long list (1b), cn tags / occasional use of unreliable sources, many one-sentence paragraphs. Will need significant work to remain a GA. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 13:23, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delist. Without even looking into the sources, it's disqualified by the fact that it's mostly proseline and excessive lists. And I don't enforce this because I've yet to see a community mandate to do so, but I personally consider a criticism section to be a layout and NPOV issue in most cases. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 16:48, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.