Talk:Blackburn Cult
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Neutral title
[edit]Can we find a more neutral title? 'Cult' is a pejorative. Sfacets 00:39, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- It seems to be what they are best known as. [1] Checking the L.A. Times archive I see they aere called a cult as far back as 1929,when the term was not necessarily pejorative. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 00:56, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Merger
[edit]I oppose the merger with Simi Valley. The only relationship is location. There is additional info available about this group. I don't see any reason for a merger. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 04:41, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- I also oppose this merger idea. This sounds silly. I am sure this article will be expanded with more info, as Will Beback has commented, above. Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 06:38, 17 October 2007 (UTC).
- I removed the tags, there is clearly enough secondary sources for a standalone article. Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 06:57, 17 October 2007 (UTC).
Categories:
- Start-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- WikiProject California articles
- Start-Class Crime-related articles
- Low-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- Start-Class Religion articles
- Low-importance Religion articles
- Start-Class New religious movements articles
- Low-importance New religious movements articles
- New religious movements articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles