Talk:Black mongoose

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Angola / Namibia Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Angola (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Namibia (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

I think the article is well-written and the sources seem to provide adequate information. It would be interesting to learn about the black mongoose's mating habits so it's a shame that there doesn't seem to be information out there. The tone sounded informative without having any bias. There are a few sentences that don't have citations at the end. I don't know if that is an issue for Wikipedia since the training suggested having every piece of information cited. Overall, great job informing me about the black mongoose! Leslier7 (talk) 06:44, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Leslie[reply]

Thank you for your feedback. Information is very limited on this species. There is no information available about mating and reproduction habits, etc. Chynarae (talk) 20:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The information provided is concise, an credible from the sources provided which include online journal articles and scientific findings. There is no bias within the context which makes it a good article for Wikipedia in that the writing is informative and not persuasive or otherwise improper for Wikipedia's rules. The only thing I can add is that the information seems to be short. Although the article was originally a stub which was added onto, it seems that there could be more information within each category. An example would be under the heading Description and Behavior, other characteristics could be added such as reproduction, mating patterns and season, differences in male and female, etc. The same could be done under range and habitat such as predation and how they avoid predators, and so on. More information could have been added overall such as conservation efforts, biology of the mongoose, etc. Overall, the article is well written and it can be understood that information may have been limited on this species. Rmfrank1 (talk) 17:49, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide complete literature references for your sources (Author, year, title, journal, volume, pages). Thanks! DrBuchholz (talk) 16:01, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The size listed is way off. It's supposed to be longer than the slender mongoose, not shorter than a dwarf mongoose. Unfortunately every online source I've found has an even more ridiculous size given. One paper said 800cm. As in 8 meters. What? I think the papers on this guy have a reoccurring translation issue. I'm not a wikipedian, help me out here.72.217.80.198 (talk) 02:17, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Chynarae. Peer reviewers: Leslier7, Rmfrank1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:08, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]