Talk:Black holes in fiction/GA2

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: TompaDompa (talk · contribs) 01:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: The Blue Rider (talk · contribs) 08:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Stability

• Last edit on 19 of September; the article is stable.

Images

• The only image has an appropriate copyright status and it is relevant.

Early depictions

• Examples are given, but is there a general description on how black holes were usually portrayed in early depictions, like characteristics for example.
  • Not really, apart from being depicted as hazards to space travelers. TompaDompa (talk) 19:21, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Time dilation

• In the last sentence, I suggest a more layman's wording: a planet orbits a black hole so closely that it experiences time dilation with a factor of approximately 60,000 relative to Earth to "a planet orbits a black hole so closely that it experiences time dilation, causing time to pass 60,000 times more slowly than on Earth."
  • Rephrased. TompaDompa (talk) 19:21, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.