Talk:Black holes in fiction/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Unsuccessful. Broc (talk) 19:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: TompaDompa (talk · contribs) 22:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Broc (talk · contribs) 19:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Failed "good article" nomination[edit]

This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of July 6, 2024, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?:

Pass

2. Verifiable?:

Pass

3. Broad in coverage?:

Of the authors mentioned who have a Wikipedia entry, 20 are American and 8 British. No other nationalities are represented, and one can safely assume that the topic has been present in science fiction all across the world.

4. Neutral point of view?:

Issues of geographical bias need to be solved, the article should represent a global view of the subject.

5. Stable?:

Pass

6. Images?:

Pass

Very interesting, well-written and well-sourced article. My main concern is the exclusive focus on American and British authors. Either the title needs to be changed (e.g.: "Black holes in American fiction") or the article needs a more global approach.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— Broc (talk) 19:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.