Talk:Black Lake Nature Reserve

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cheshire Low‑importance

	Cheshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed name change

I propose moving this to Black Lake, Delamere, which is the name of the SSSI as well as the geographical location. I'm not sure how formal the "nature reserve" designation, and that name certainly isn't widely used by visitors to the site. Espresso Addict (talk) 16:32, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No objection from me, though it is a CWT Reserve[1] so the designation as a nature reserve is reasonable. One of User:CheshireWildlifeTrust's creations, again. Dave.Dunford (talk) 19:16, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After finding this one, I've just gone through the whole set of CWT nature reserves, many of which were miscategorised as being in Cheshire, and none of which paid any attention to the existing article structure, so there are several duplicates of older articles covering pretty much the same area. This seems to be one of the few where someone has bothered to try to rescue the original article -- thanks! I have a whole set of photos of Black Lake which I will try to get around to loading to Commons for convenience. Espresso Addict (talk) 19:42, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I had a go at improving some of the CWT articles, but I have limited sources at my disposal and I'm not an expert on Cheshire. I'm also engaged on another little project at the moment but I may come back to these. Dave.Dunford (talk)

Before my extended wikibreak, I'd worked up the list of Cheshire SSSIs and started to create a few of them, which is a project I do eventually hope to get back to. It is often hard to find any references beyond the SSSI description, though. Espresso Addict (talk) 20:28, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed - my experience was the same. And I found the SSSI listings to be somewhat specialist (concentrating mainly on the species to be found) and often rather out of date. Dave.Dunford (talk) 20:38, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Black Lake Nature Reserve. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:56, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]