Jump to content

Talk:Black (2005 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Is anyone willing to add more to the storyline? It should contain the whole story spoilers included. You can write a short description as a sub-section I guess for those who want to know what it's about but not wanting to spoil the movie for them. I would but I'm not to fond of the film at all.

ब्लॅक or ब्लैक

[edit]

Is the Hindi spelling ब्लॅक or ब्लैक? So far on the internet I have found ब्लॅक used only in Marathi.--Wolf talk | हिन्दी | বাংলা 16:49, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Black Film.jpg

[edit]

Image:Black Film.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

[edit]
  • Jhoomur Bose Malik (4 February 2005). "It's bleak for Bhansali's 'Black'". Times of India. Retrieved 15 January 2010.
  • N K Deoshi (5 February 2005). "Black: Bhansali's Masterpiece". Apunka Choice. Retrieved 15 January 2010.
  • Subhash K. Jha (19 November 2004). "Black Review". Now Running.com. Retrieved 15 January 2010.
  • Gautaman Bhaskaran (11 February 2005). "Black". The Hindu. Retrieved 15 January 2010.
  • Taran Adrash (4 February 2005). "Black". Bollywood Hungama. Retrieved 15 January 2010.

Copana2002 (talk) 15:49, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts?

[edit]

Should there be any Indian script here? The title of the movie is officially in English, and the language is primarily English, so I can't see why a script is necessary. Shahid • Talk2me 16:20, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Black (2005 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:30, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews?

[edit]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Black (2005 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 01:28, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:28, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • The source for the poster links to Pinterest, a non-reliable source, so I would swap it for something else.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • That being said, the rest of the poster's non-free rationale is in excellent shape.
  • I also couldn't find any issues with the infobox.
  • "he meet several" → "he met several"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "to made another" → "to make another"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Add a comma after "written by Bhansali, Bhavani Iyer".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "budget around" → "budget of around"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "With a total grossing" → "With a total gross"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Add a comma after "Bhansali's direction".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Add a comma after "Best Actor for Bachchan".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plot and cast

[edit]
  • "after recovered" → "after recovering"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Debraj (an elderly alcoholic teacher) enters" → "Debraj, an elderly alcoholic teacher, enters"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "when he see" → "when he sees"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "back to be insolent" → "back to being insolent"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not sure whether Indian English uses the ending "se" or "ze", but if its the second one, change "recognise" to "recognize" and "vocalise" to "vocalize".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "a expressive woman, and is even able to dance" → "an expressive woman who is even able to dance"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Plot section is under 700 words, so that passes WP:FILMPLOT.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • No issues with cast.

Production

[edit]
  • "Hindi film ever" → "Hindi films ever"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "he would quoted" → "he would say"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "In an interview to" → "In an interview with"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "inspired from" → "inspired by"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "As a gratitude" → "As gratitude"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Bachchan take a hiatus" → "Bachchan took a hiatus"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "To prepare his part" → "To prepare for his part"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "a special training" → "special training"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "he did an extensive research" → "he did extensive research"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "what happen" → "what happens"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "physical disability" → "physical disabilities"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "an theatre actress" → "a theatre actress"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Add a comma after "produced, financed".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "sure for it" → "sure about it"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "lot monochromatic" → "lot of monochromatic"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Add a comma after "khaki".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "between 1950s" → "between the 1950s"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "were chose" → "were chosen"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove the comma after "highest-paid actors in Bollywood".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "film in his career" → "films in his career"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "he shoot a film" → "he shot a film"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "promised to collaborated" → "promised to collaborate"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "filmed is the" → "filmed was the"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Mukerji stretch out her hand when snow starts to fall" → "Mukerji stretching out her hand when snow begins to fall"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Media reported" → "The media reported"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "would ended" → "would end"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "mostly of the set" → "most of the set"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "resulting a shooting" → "resulting in a shooting"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "for did not return 390" → "for not returning 390"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Deputy Chief Minister" → "the Deputy Chief Minister"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Soundtrack

[edit]
  • "Armenian instrument" → "the Armenian instrument"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Release

[edit]
  • "film had a good" → "film had good"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "was coincided" → "coincided"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "28 August 2009 in" → "28 August 2009 on"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "a non-Korean films" → "a non-Korean film"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Black has been screened" → "Black was screened"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Prime Video since" → "Prime Video in"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception

[edit]
  • "mostly critics" → "most critics"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Add a comma after "Bhansali's direction".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Box office

[edit]
  • Add a comma after "the Netherlands".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accolades

[edit]
  • "win the all four" → "win all four"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Add a comma after "Best Actor".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Legacy

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
  • The link to Rotten Tomatoes is unnecessary per WP:ELRC.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The "Films by Sanjay Leela Bhansali" should go on top.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:03, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Black_(2005_film)&oldid=1200100516"