Talk:Bjorli Station/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Starstriker7^(Talk) 05:21, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

I'll take on this review. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 05:21, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Turntable is wikilinked in the Lead. Is it wikilinked to the right article?
   

"excluding water tower and restaurant" in Plot - add an "its" between excluding and water?
"it has been used as a storage " in Plot - replace "has been used as" with "was used as".
"but open from 07 to 22." - What does this mean?
"and serves an Alpine skiing center" - that serves as an Alpine skiing center.
"NSB operates the trains as tourists trains" - as tourist trains?

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   I'm taking most of the references in good faith, as most are offline or are in Norwegian. I've checked the online Norwegian sources using Google Translate. I'm having a little trouble finding the a, c, and d references for reference 11.

   For me, the Google translate is pretty bad. The last sentence under Bjorli says Bjorli stasjon er endestasjon for turisttogene fra Åndalsnes om sommeren. Her er det også et stort alpinlegg. Stasjonen er betjent av Jernbaneverket for togkryssinger. = "Bjorli Station is the terminus station for the tourist trains form Åndalsnes during the summer. Here there is also a large Alpine skiing center. The station is manned by the Norwegian National Rail Administration for trains to pass." That should cover all the points.

2. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

4. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   This photograph is licensed in such a way that demands the photographer is attributed. Perhaps you could place something into the caption, if need be? I misread the license conditions; my apologies. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 19:44, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

6. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   The only problems I found in this article were those of grammar nitpicks and the image deal, so there isn't really much that keeps it from GA. Nice work on another one, Arsenikk; I look forward to reviewing more of your articles in the future. :) --Starstriker7^(Talk) 06:25, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

   Hey, I'm on vacation now, so I've don't have much time to do much on Wikipedia until the weekend. Hope it's fine that I wait with looking into this until then. Thanks for the review, anyway. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:46, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

   Thanks for the review. All has been seen to now, and I cannot find any shortcomings in the source. Arsenikk ^(talk) 17:58, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

   Alright. :) I'll pass this one in a little bit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starstriker7's Sidekick (talk • contribs) 00:05, 21 July 2011 (UTC)