Talk:Bjarke Mogensen

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bjarke Mogensen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131126221945/http://www.orchidclassics.com/main.htm to http://www.orchidclassics.com/main.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110805215601/http://www.dr.dk/p2/begivenheder/kammermusikkonkurrencen-2011 to http://www.dr.dk/P2/Begivenheder/kammermusikkonkurrencen-2011/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121229105708/http://www.dr.dk:80/DR2/Spilforlivet/Artikler/2006/20070508122411.htm to http://www.dr.dk/DR2/Spilforlivet/Artikler/2006/20070508122411.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.sonningmusik.dk/cms/view/index.asp?ipageid=585

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

External links

There are nine entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion.

• ELpoints #3) states: Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
• LINKFARM states: There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
• WP:ELMIN: Minimize the number of links.
• WP:ELCITE: access dates are not appropriate in the external links section. Do not use {{cite web}} or other citation templates in the External links section. Citation templates are permitted in the Further reading section. -- Otr500 (talk) 20:08, 9 March 2023 (UTC)