Talk:Bivalent (genetics)

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 January 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was WP:WITHDRAWN..

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Cleanup

This article was tagged for cleanup but I don't know what cleanup is being requested so I am removing the cleanup tag. RJFJR (talk) 15:05, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Renovation

On April 2016 I renovated the article, organized sections and provided appropriate references. It would be good to obtain some image of light microscopy of a bivalent under creative commons license to illustrate the text (annotate centromere, chiasmata, homologs, chromatids etc...).

Definition

Is it correct, that bivalents have at least 1 cross over? According to Essential Cell Biology (Alberts et al.), they don't need to have a cross over. Can we have a citation for the defenition? Some of the earliest version from 2013 also stated that bivalents are just 2 chromosomes (4 chromatids) held together by a complex: nothing about any cross over? None of the later citated sources contain any actual definition of bivalents, they just mention them in a context to other subjects? Benj5378 (talk) 16:32, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]