Talk:Bitcoin Satoshi Vision
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article Bitcoin Satoshi Vision, along with other pages relating to blockchain and cryptocurrencies, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.
|
standards
[edit]@Artem P75: we have already discussed with you that you are not use industry sources such as coindesk and also the cnbc18 source. Please cleanup this article. Please also reduce the focus on CSW in the lead. @Grayfell: fyi of this new article. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 05:14, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Apologies, I will work on tidying up the article - I am still working on understanding the stricter crypto sources and pulled some sources from other crypto related articles assuming they would be okay as they were already on crypto articles.
- Would you like me to move this article back to draft space until it has been cleaned up? Artem P75 (talk) 05:24, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- @JtbobwaysfI have removed half of the CSW info in the lead - the CNBC source was actually straight from the BSV stub on the BCH article which is why I kept it (I just copied the stub straight over) I am more than happy for it to be removed if you are not okay with it | EDIT: I also removed the CNBC source as per your request Artem P75 (talk) 05:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- I am ok with it being a live article. Just wanted to let you know that someone could send it to WP:AFD so it is smart to do your cleanup asap. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 06:24, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Understood, thank you very much for making me aware! Artem P75 (talk) 06:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- I am ok with it being a live article. Just wanted to let you know that someone could send it to WP:AFD so it is smart to do your cleanup asap. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 06:24, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- @JtbobwaysfI have removed half of the CSW info in the lead - the CNBC source was actually straight from the BSV stub on the BCH article which is why I kept it (I just copied the stub straight over) I am more than happy for it to be removed if you are not okay with it | EDIT: I also removed the CNBC source as per your request Artem P75 (talk) 05:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
cleanup
[edit]So I did a little cleanup and removed the content from the Bitcoin Cash article as it was largely duplicated. Hopefully this article sticks around. I also removed the claim that Satoshi was the author of this crypto in the infobox, not true (at least unsourced) on this article as well as the the Bitcoin Cash article. Suggest to Artem P75 to see if you can find some content over at google books or try to find a few more high quality RS for this article. Always better to do it asap before someone tries to nominate for AFD (it can be really frustrating to do the work to create a page and then it gets deleted). The easiest way to ward that off is having a lot of good sources. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 05:14, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your help @Jtbobwaysf I will continue to look for RS to support / expand this article, I will take on your advice to look through Google Books as well Artem P75 (talk) 05:24, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Welcome, I suggest to try to get the article to 15-20 good sources and see if you can add a bit more text while you are at it. This will best help to ward of those editors that like to delete articles. Its pretty borderline right now with 10. I would use WP:NCORP as a guideline to help you get there. Also be vigilant of any text that looks like it is WP:PROMO as that can also raise the ayre of editors, not that this article subject is going to be in a very good light by many in my opinion. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 06:57, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
October 15, 2024:"knockoff" in Header
[edit]"Bitcoin Satoshi Vision is a knockoff of bitcoin", is biased. It uses a pejorative term ("knockoff") which implies a negative judgment.
I propose its deletion.
Light Jagami (talk) 06:19, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- I agree, I have changed it. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 06:27, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
very welcome Light Jagami (talk) 06:32, 15 October 2024 (UTC)( Blocked sockpuppet of Lustigermutiger21, see investigation)
- Start-Class WikiProject Cryptocurrency articles
- Low-importance WikiProject Cryptocurrency articles
- WikiProject Cryptocurrency articles
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- Start-Class software articles
- Low-importance software articles
- Start-Class software articles of Low-importance
- All Software articles
- Start-Class Computer Security articles
- Low-importance Computer Security articles
- Start-Class Computer Security articles of Low-importance
- All Computer Security articles
- All Computing articles
- Start-Class Cryptography articles
- Low-importance Cryptography articles
- Start-Class Computer science articles
- Low-importance Computer science articles
- WikiProject Computer science articles
- WikiProject Cryptography articles
- Wikipedia articles under general sanctions