Talk:Bisulfite sequencing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bisulfite sequencing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070124172616/http://www.sanger.ac.uk/PostGenomics/epigenome/ to http://www.sanger.ac.uk/PostGenomics/epigenome/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:35, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Figure 2

I think figure 2 is misleading, as it suggests the addition of water AND ammonium is necessary for the deamination step and not that ammonium is the bi-product. Or am I wrong here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.174.140.198 (talk) 23:09, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct. Water is consumed and NH4+ is producedPelirojopajaro (talk) 13:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]